4.3 Article

Modelling potential cost savings from use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with Type 1 diabetes

期刊

DIABETIC MEDICINE
卷 36, 期 12, 页码 1652-1658

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dme.14046

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medtronic
  2. JDRF [17-2011-533, 80-2010-585]
  3. JDRF Canadian Clinical Trial Network (CCTN)
  4. FedDev Ontario
  5. Tommy's charity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim To investigate potential cost savings associated with the use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) throughout pregnancy in women with Type 1 diabetes. Methods A budget impact model was developed to estimate, from the perspective of National Health Service England, the total costs of managing pregnancy and delivery in women with Type 1 diabetes using self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) with and without RT-CGM. It was assumed that the entire modelled cohort (n = 1441) would use RT-CGM from 10 to 38 weeks' gestation (7 months). Data on pregnancy and neonatal complication rates and related costs were derived from published literature, national tariffs, and device manufacturers. Results The cost of glucose monitoring was 588 pound with SMBG alone and 1820 pound with RT-CGM. The total annual costs of managing pregnancy and delivery in women with Type 1 diabetes were 23 pound 725 648 with SMBG alone, and 14 pound 165 187 with SMBG and RT-CGM; indicating potential cost savings of approximately 9 pound 560 461 from using RT-CGM. The principal drivers of cost savings were the daily cost of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions (3743) pound and the shorter duration of NICU stay (mean 6.6 vs. 9.1 days respectively). Sensitivity analyses showed that RT-CGM remained cost saving, albeit to lesser extents, across a range of NICU costs and durations of hospital stay, and with varying numbers of daily SMBG measurements. Conclusions Routine use of RT-CGM by pregnant women with Type 1 diabetes, would result in substantial cost savings, mainly through reductions in NICU admissions and shorter duration of NICU care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据