4.7 Article

Free nitrous acid and pH determine the predominant ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and amount of N2O in a partial nitrifying reactor

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 101, 期 4, 页码 1673-1683

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-016-7961-2

关键词

Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria; Partial nitrification; Nitrous oxide; Free ammonia; Free nitrous acid

资金

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization [11B13001d]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [26701009]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26701009, 16J08490] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the effects of free ammonia (FA) and free nitrous acid (FNA) concentrations on the predominant ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and the emission of nitrous oxide (N2O) in a lab-scale sequencing batch reactor for partial nitrification. The reactor was operated with stepwise increases in the NH4 (+) loading rate, which resulted in a maximum FA concentration of 29.3 mg-N/L at pH 8.3. Afterwards, FNA was increased by a gradual decrease of pH, reaching its maximum concentration of 4.1 mg-N/L at pH 6.3. Fluorescence in situ hybridization indicated that AOB remained predominant during the operation, achieving specific nitrification rates of 1.04 and 0.99 g-N/g-VSS/day at the highest accumulations of FA and FNA, respectively. These rates were in conjunction with partial nitrification efficiencies of > 84%. The N2O emission factor of oxidized NH4 (+) was 0.90% at pH 7.0, which was higher than those at pH 8.3 (0.11%) and 6.3 (0.12%), the pHs with the maximum FA and FNA concentrations, respectively. High-throughput sequencing of 16S ribosomal RNA genes showed that increases in FNA drastically changed the predominant AOB species, although increased FA produced no significant changes. This study demonstrates that the FNA concentration and pH are the main drivers that determine the predominant AOB species and N2O-emission in a partial nitrifying bioreactor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据