4.5 Article

Evolving SAXS versatility: solution X-ray scattering for macromolecular architecture, functional landscapes, and integrative structural biology

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 197-213

出版社

CURRENT BIOLOGY LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.04.004

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P01 CA92584, R35 CA220430]
  2. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RR140052, RP180813]
  3. University of Texas System Science and Technology Acquisition and Retention
  4. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Integrated Diffraction Analysis Technologies (IDAT) program
  5. NIH [P30 GM1241.69]
  6. Robert A. Welch Chemistry Chair

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) has emerged as an enabling integrative technique for comprehensive analyses of macromolecular structures and interactions in solution. Over the past two decades, SAXS has become a mainstay of the structural biologist's toolbox, supplying multiplexed measurements of molecular shape and dynamics that unveil biological function. Here, we discuss evolving SAXS theory, methods, and applications that extend the field of small-angle scattering beyond simple shape characterization. SAXS, coupled with size exclusion chromatography (SEC-SAXS) and time-resolved (TR-SAXS) methods, is now providing high-resolution insight into macromolecular flexibility and ensembles, delineating biophysical landscapes, and facilitating high-throughput library screening to assess macromolecular properties and to create opportunities for drug discovery. Looking forward, we consider SAXS in the integrative era of hybrid structural biology methods, its potential for illuminating cellular supramolecular and mesoscale structures, and its capacity to complement high-throughput bioinformatics sequencing data. As advances in the field continue, we look forward to proliferating uses of SAXS based upon its abilities to robustly produce mechanistic insights for biology and medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据