4.7 Article

Performance of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) with cement partially replaced by ground granite powder (GGP) under different curing conditions

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 213, 期 -, 页码 469-482

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.058

关键词

Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC); Granite powder; Curing conditions; Hydration products; Pore structure; Strength; Chloride permeability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51708119, 51878179]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Properties of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) which used ground granite powder (GGP) to replace cement by different ratios (from 0 to 25%) are experimentally investigated. The hydration products and pore structure on the micro scale, and the compressive and flexural strength as well as chloride permeability on the macro scale, were studied. Influence of curing conditions, i.e., standard curing (SC), warm water curing (WWC), and autoclaved curing (AC), was also explored. It was found that though the replacement of cement by GGP did not influence the morphology and chemical compositions of hydration products, however, the pore structure changed significantly over the replacement ratio, i.e., omega(GGP). Compared to SC and WWC, AC can significantly improve the hydration degree of cement and promote the polymerization degree of hydration products. WWC and AC also improved the pore structure of UHPC prepared with GGP. Compressive and flexural strength as well as the anti-permeability were found to first increase and then decrease with the growth of omega(GGP); the optimal omega(GGP), were 5%, 10%, and 15% for UHPC specimens cured under SC, WWC, and AC, respectively. It was also found that the compressive and flexural strength are linearly related to the total porosity, while the chloride permeability is linearly related to the contents of harmful and more-harmful pores. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据