4.7 Article

Evaluation of alkali-activated mortars containing high volume waste ceramic powder and fly ash replacing GBFS

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 78-92

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.194

关键词

Sustainable concrete; Waste tile ceramic; Durability; Saving energy

资金

  1. UTM COE research grants [Q.J130000.2409.04G00]
  2. FRGS grant [R. J130000.7822.4F722]
  3. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  4. Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional Portland cement can be effectively substituted by alkali-activated binders. Not only can alkali-activated binders save energy and reduce CO2 emission but they can also augment the durability performance of concrete as well as aid in resolving the landfill problems. It is well-known that extensive quantities of calcined clay waste are created every year by the ceramic industry, of which a significant amount is used in landfills. It is thus more appropriate to reuse this waste efficiently. This study investigated the impacts on sustainability of waste ceramic tile powder (WCP) based alkali-activated mortars (AAMs) incorporating fly ash (FA) as a replacement of ground blast furnace slag (GBFS), which were exposed to various hostile environments. Binders were prepared by maintaining the WCP content at 50% in all alkali-activated mortars (AAMs) and FA replacing GBFS by 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%. Durability properties were evaluated which included elevated temperatures, sulphate and acid attack, drying shrinkage, freezing-thawing and wet-dry cycles, as well as water permeability. The findings suggested that freezing-thawing resistance increased and better durability was displayed by increasing the FA content in AAMs. Furthermore, AAMs with high FA content led to enhance the performance in terms of sulphate and acid environments and elevated temperatures. Apart from the increased durability, replacing GBFS with FA also resulted in decreased energy consumption, AAMs cost, and CO2 emission. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据