4.7 Article

Behaviour of pultruded GFRP truss system connected using through-bolt with mechanical insert

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 44-57

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.052

关键词

Pultruded FRP; Truss; Tubular section; Hollow section; Bolted connection; Joint insert

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP180102208]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the experimental and analytical studies of double-chorded composite truss system connected using stainless steel through-bolts with mechanical inserts. The composite trusses were assembled using rectangular hollow sections of pultruded glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) where adhesively bonded mechanical inserts were introduced at the vicinity of the joining areas. The trusses were tested under 4-point bending (Load Case 1) and 3-point bending (Load Case 2). From this experimental program, the load-vertical deflection behaviour of the truss, internal forces distribution in the members and joint behaviour were investigated. The pultruded GFRP truss under Load Case 1 was capable of resisting the maximum load capacity of the testing equipment at 450 kN with the lowest factor of safety of 1.10 was attained by the external diagonal members. High axial compression forces experienced by the external diagonal members has exceeded the American pre-standard theoretical joint bearing capacity by 2%, and this was reflected by the minor bearing damage observed on the joints of these members. Meanwhile, the truss under Load Case 2 failed at 160 kN with the continuous top chords ruptured in flexural bending manner. The satisfactory comparisons between the Strand 7 truss model and experimental results demonstrated the validity of the adopted simplified numerical model. Additionally, the theoretical strength limits of pultruded GFRP truss members in tension, compression and flexural according to American pre-standard are in close agreement with the experimental results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据