4.6 Article

Luminescent surface-functionalized mesoporous core-shell nanospheres and their cytotoxicity evaluation

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.04.049

关键词

Terbium hydroxide; Silica nanospheres; Optical properties; Luminescence properties; Biocompatibility; Cytotoxicity

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University, Riyadh [RG-1438-094]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spherical shaped SiO2@Tb(OH)(3) nanospheres (core-shell NSs) with an average grain size of 300-350 nm were successfully synthesized at a large scale via sol-gel process with subsequent heat treatment. XRD results demonstrated the non-crystalline nature of the sample even after coating with terbium hydroxide. TEM and SEM images clearly showed that the prepared sample was highly monodispersed, perfectly spherical in shape, and mesoporous with narrow size distribution (an average crystalline size of 350 nm). XRD, TGA, TEM, SEM, and EDX results demonstrated that the terbium hydroxide layer was effectively grafted over the surface of the silica spheres, which was further verified using FTIR, UV/Visible, and emission spectral results. The emission spectrum of core-shell NSs demonstrates that Tb3+ is strongly bonded covalently to the silica framework with surface anchored oxygen atoms, thus preventing the accumulation of Tb3+ ions to give an efficient luminescence. The emission spectrum was dominated by D-5(4)-> F-4(5) of the Tb3+ ion located in the green region at 2.88 eV along with broad emission of the silica framework. The MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium) bromide and neutral red uptake assays on MCF-7 and A-549 cells clearly illustrated the high biocompatibility and non-toxic nature of the samples. Because of the high specific surface area, mesoporous nature, and presence of abundant hydroxyl groups on the surface of the particles, these materials can be applied for tagging bioactive molecules or for loading high quantity anti-cancer drugs for biomedical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据