4.3 Article

Effectiveness of Adjuvant Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Cohort Study

期刊

CLINICAL BREAST CANCER
卷 19, 期 5, 页码 E654-E667

出版社

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.06.003

关键词

Aromatase inhibitor; Early breast cancer; Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist; Tamoxifen; Treatment effectiveness

类别

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) under the Harvard Medical School Portugal program [HMSP-ICJ/0007/2013]
  2. Susan G. Komen Foundation for the Cure (SKC) [CCR17483507]
  3. FCT
  4. SKC
  5. Registo Oncologico Regional do Sul
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [HMSP-ICJ/0007/2013] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use and effectiveness of adjuvant ovarian function suppression (OFS) for stage I to III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer is poorly characterized. In a multicenter retrospective cohort study of premenopausal women, we found that the use of OFS increased after 2014 from 16% to 25% of patients, in 30% of whom it was used in combination with aromatase inhibitors. Use of OFS improved overall survival. Background: Ovarian function suppression (OFS) with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) improves disease-free survival in premenopausal women with breast cancer, mostly in those at higher risk of recurrence. However, its real-world use and impact remain poorly understood. Patients and Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study of premenopausal women with stage I to III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer diagnosed from 2006 to 2015 that aimed to look at the uptake and effectiveness of the addition of OFS to backbone endocrine therapy (tamoxifen or AI). To deal with confounding, we used both multivariate modeling and propensity score matching. Results: Of 1717 eligible patients, 17.1% were treated with OFS. There was a substantial increase of use of OFS over time, especially from 2014 onward (16% vs. 25% after 2014), particularly for the combination with AI (0.4% vs. 8% after 2014). In a multivariate model, only younger age and year of diagnosis >= 2014 were associated with OFS utilization (both P < .001). With a median follow-up of 38 months (P25-P75, 19.6-66.4 months), patients receiving OFS had a better overall survival than those not receiving OFS (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.96; absolute benefit at 5 years, 2.1% [95.3% vs. 93.2% in those not receiving OFS]). A similar benefit was identified using propensity score matching. Conclusions: In the real-world setting, there was an increase in the use of OFS after 2014. After 2014, one-quarter of premenopausal women received adjuvant OFS, of which more than 30% received it in combination with an AI. In this study, the use of adjuvant OFS was associated with an overall survival benefit. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据