4.6 Article

Effect of the mean flow on the anomalous anticyclone over the Indo-Northwest Pacific in post-El Nino summers

期刊

CLIMATE DYNAMICS
卷 53, 期 9-10, 页码 5725-5741

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-019-04893-z

关键词

ENSO; East Asian Climate; Anomalous anticyclone

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA20060502]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41425086, 41661144016, 41706026]
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation [1637450]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Tropical Oceanography, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences [LTO1704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A large-scale anomalous anticyclone (AAC) is a recurrent pattern in post-El Nino summers, extending from the tropical Northwest Pacific (NWP) to the North Indian Ocean. In boreal summer, there is a strongly confluent lower-level flow between the monsoonal westerlies and easterly trades over the Indo-Northwest Pacific. The effect of this basic state confluent flow on the AAC is investigated with energetics analysis and numerical modeling. The results show that the lower-level mean flow over the Indo-Northwest Pacific aids the AAC development. Specifically, the conversion of kinetic energy from the mean confluent flow to perturbations helps amplify easterly anomalies over the Indo-Northwest Pacific in post-El Nino summers. The enhanced easterly wind anomalies provide a positive feedback onto the AAC by inducing surface Ekman divergence to suppress convection over the NWP. Moreover, the structure of the optimal diabatic heating for the AAC pattern is determined using a method similar to the Green's function approach. The optimal forcing features heating in the tropical Indian Ocean and cooling in the NWP. This suggests that barotropic energy conversion in the confluence zone and the El Nino-induced positive (negative) sea surface temperature anomalies over the TIO (NWP) together lead to the AAC development over the Indo-Northwest Pacific in post-El Nino summers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据