4.7 Article

Simulations of dynamic properties of particles in horizontal rotating ellipsoidal drums

期刊

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
卷 40, 期 17-18, 页码 7708-7723

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2016.03.035

关键词

Granular flow; Rotating ellipsoidal drum; Flow regimes; Flattening; Discrete element method

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51390494, 21276056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flow behavior of particles in the horizontal rotating ellipsoidal drum (RED) is predicted by means of the discrete element method (DEM). The effect of flattening of the ellipsoidal drum on flow regimes of particles is simulated because of its importance to industrial applications, and because the underlying flow of particles is not fully explained yet. Different flow regimes are produced by varying flattening. The resulting contact forces between the drum wall and particles are predicted in the horizontal RED and horizontal rotating cylinder drum (RCD). The flow of particles in the horizontal RED becomes significantly different to that in the horizontal RCD due to the increase of flattening of the ellipsoidal drum. At high rotation speed, a crescent shaped flow mode is observed at the orientation angle of 90 and a showery raining mode is observed at 120. The results show that the resulting contact forces between the particles and the drum wall increase with the increase of flattening and rotation speed. The velocity of particles is changed with the orientation angle of the horizontal RED. The translational granular temperature and configurational temperature are calculated from simulated instantaneous translational velocity and displacement of particles, respectively. The simulated translational granular temperature and configurational temperature increase with the increase of flattening and rotation speed. The rate of energy dissipation through collisions and contact interactions of particles is predicted in the horizontal RED and RCD. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据