4.5 Article

An International Laboratory Comparison Study of Volumetric and Gravimetric Hydrogen Adsorption Measurements

期刊

CHEMPHYSCHEM
卷 20, 期 15, 页码 1997-2009

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201900166

关键词

hydrogen storage measurement; comparative measurement study; excess capacity; volumetric capacity

资金

  1. Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) [1208-0000] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Argonne National Laboratory Funding Source: Medline
  3. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Funding Source: Medline
  4. National Renewable Energy Laboratory [DE-AC04-94AL85000] Funding Source: Medline
  5. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Funding Source: Medline
  6. Office of Science of U. S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357] Funding Source: Medline
  7. Sandia National Laboratories [DE-AC02-05CH11231] Funding Source: Medline
  8. U.S. Department of Energy Funding Source: Medline
  9. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC36-08GO28308] Funding Source: Medline
  10. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA-0003525] Funding Source: Medline
  11. Energy Materials Network Funding Source: Medline
  12. Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) [DE-AC05- 06OR23100] Funding Source: Medline
  13. National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia Funding Source: Medline
  14. Alliance for Sustainable Energy Funding Source: Medline
  15. Hydrogen Materials-Advanced Research Consortium (HyMARC) Funding Source: Medline
  16. Fullbright-Nehru Postdoctoral Research [2044/FNPDR/2015] Funding Source: Medline
  17. Fuel Cell Technologies Office [DE-AC36-08-GO28308] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to determine a material's hydrogen storage potential, capacity measurements must be robust, reproducible, and accurate. Commonly, research reports focus on the gravimetric capacity, and often times the volumetric capacity is not reported. Determining volumetric capacities is not as straight-forward, especially for amorphous materials. This is the first study to compare measurement reproducibility across laboratories for excess and total volumetric hydrogen sorption capacities based on the packing volume. The use of consistent measurement protocols, common analysis, and figure of merits for reporting data in this study, enable the comparison of the results for two different materials. Importantly, the results show good agreement for excess gravimetric capacities amongst the laboratories. Irreproducibility for excess and total volumetric capacities is attributed to real differences in the measured packing volume of the material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据