4.7 Article

Emissions of pollutant gases, fine particulate matters and their significant tracers from biomass burning in an open-system combustion chamber

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 224, 期 -, 页码 407-416

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.153

关键词

Air pollutants; Pollutant gases; Emission factor; Biomass burning; Combustion chamber; Open burning simulation

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund (TRF), ABC (Area Based Collaborative Research) section [RDG58A0017]
  2. Chiang Mai University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An open-system combustion chamber was designed and constructed for simulation of burning of various biomass types to estimate emission factors of pollutant gases, fine particulate matters and their composition to find out significant tracers. Rice straw (RS), maize residues (MR) and forest leaf litters (FLL) from mixed deciduous forest (MDF) and dry dipterocarp forest (DDF) were collected from various places in Northern Thailand based on land-use types. Approximately 1 kg of air-dried biomass sample was burned in the chamber, PM2.5 were collected. CO2 dominated during the flaming state while CO is predominant in the smoldering state. The highest EFPM2.5 was obtained from MDF burning (4.38 +/- 2.99 g kg(-1)), while the lowest value was from MR burning (2.15 +/- 0.95 g kg(-1)). Among water soluble ions, K+ (biomass burning (BB) tracer) was the most abundant species in PM2.5 followed by Cl- and SO42-. The average EFK+ from the burning of agricultural biomass was significantly higher than the burning of FLL. Scatter plot of K+/SO42- versus K+/Cl- can be used to distinguish between agricultural crop residues and FLL burning. Levoglucosan (BB tracer) was a dominant species among anhydrosugars and also a major component found in FLL burning. The ratios of levoglucosan/K+ and levoglucosan/mannosan obtained from forest and agricultural waste burnings were significantly different, therefore they can be used for BB source identification. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据