4.7 Article

Implications of nano- and micrometer-size platinum-group element minerals in base metal sulfides of the Yangliuping Ni-Cu-PGE sulfide deposit, SW China

期刊

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
卷 517, 期 -, 页码 7-21

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.04.015

关键词

Nanometer-size PGE-arsenides and sulfarsenides; Semimetal elements; Pt-As molecular; PGE distribution

资金

  1. NSFC projects of China [41473050, 41630316, 41772067]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0600503]
  3. Open Funding Project of State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research, Nanjing University [2018-LAMD-K08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The concentrations of platinum-group elements (PGE) and semimetal elements (As, Sb, Se, Te and Bi) in the base metal sulfides from the Yangliuping deposit were determined using Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICPMS). Mass balance calculation reveals that the base metal sulfides only contain < 40 wt% Os, < 15 wt% Ir, < 25 wt% Pd and negligible Pt, Rh and As, as solid solution. Such PGE percentages in the base-metal sulfides as solid solution are evidently lower than in the sulfides from the Jinchuan, Norilsk and Sudbury Ni-Cu-(PGE) sulfide deposits. Euhedral shape and similar chemical composition of the nanometer-size PGE-arsenides and sulfarsenides in the base-metal sulfides suggest that they crystallized from the sulfide melt before the crystallization of monosulfide solid solution (MSS) and intermediate solid solution (ISS). It is proposed that the nanometer-size PGE-arsenides and sulfarsenides formed from PGE-As molecular or polymolecular clusters in the sulfide liquid at high temperature. The PGE-As molecular or polymolecular clusters prevent As and PGE from partitioning into the base metal sulfide lattice and tend to form discrete nanometer-size PGE-arsenides and sulfarsenides. Thus, semimetal elements, particularly As, play an important role on behaviour of PGE during solidification of magmatic sulfide liquids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据