4.6 Article

On the relationship of YAP and FAK in hMSCs and osteosarcoma cells: Discrimination of FAK modulation by nuclear YAP depletion or YAP silencing

期刊

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2019.109382

关键词

Yes-associated protein (YAP) co-transcriptional activator; Focal adhesion kinase (FAK); Focal adhesions (FAs); Proliferation; Senescence; Osteogenic genes; Osteosarcoma cells (Saos)

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG, Germany [RU 489/29-1, TO 198/15-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The HIPPO pathway effector YAP has been shown to be regulated by FAK-signaling. However, the existence of an inverse relationship between YAP and FAK is unknown. Here we demonstrate in hMSCs and in the human osteosarcoma derived cell line Saos that Verteporfin- or RNAi-dependent YAP depletion has opposing influence on FAK. While Verteporfin strikingly reduced cellular FAK protein and phosphorylation, RNAi led to an increase of both molecules and point on a generalizable aspect of the YAP/FAK interrelationship. YAP depletion also caused down-regulation of osteogenic genes in hMSCs, irrespective from the YAP intervention mode. Verteporfin induced topological changes in conjunction with reduced protein levels of beta 1 integrin, paxillin, and zyxin of focal adhesions (FAs) in hMSCs, suggesting FAK-decrease-related alterations in FAs, which seems to be a FAK-dependent mechanism. On the cell behavioral level, YAP-FAK-interrelation involves proliferation and senescence, as indicated by proliferation inhibition and increase of beta-Galactosidase-activity in hMSCs. Our findings, derived from this dual strategy of YAP intervention, reveal a YAP-FAK relationship in conjunction with molecular and cell behavioral consequences. Moreover, they deepen the current scientific knowledge on YAP from a different scientific point of view, since this inverse YAP/FAK-relationship seems to be transferrable to other cell types, including cell entities with pathological background.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据