4.5 Article

Prognostic Value of Plasma Trimethylamine N-Oxide Levels in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

期刊

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 39, 期 8, 页码 1201-1206

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10571-019-00714-3

关键词

Trimethylamine N-oxide; Gut microbiota-dependent metabolite; Clinical outcome; Ischemic stroke

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) has emerged as a newly identified gut microbiota-dependent metabolite contributing to a variety of diseases, such as diabetes, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular diseases. The aim of our study was to determine whether a relatively high TMAO level is associated with an increased risk of poor outcome in ischemic stroke patients. From June 2018 to December 2018, we prospectively recruited acute ischemic stroke patients diagnosed within 24 h of symptom onset. The plasma TMAO level was measured at admission for all patients. Functional outcome was evaluated at 3 months after the stroke using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and then dichotomized as favorable (mRS 0-2) or unfavorable (mRS 3-6). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between TMAO concentration and poor functional outcome and mortality at 3 months. Of the 225 acute ischemic stroke patients included in the analysis, the median TMAO concentration was 3.8 mu M (interquartile range, 1.9-4.8 mu M). At 3 months after admission, poor functional outcome was observed in 116 patients (51.6%), and 51 patients had died (22.7%). After adjusting for potential confounders, patients with TMAO levels in the highest quartile were more likely to have higher risks of poor functional outcome [compared with the lowest quartile, odds ratio (OR) 3.63; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34-9.82; P = 0.011] and mortality (OR 4.27; 95% CI 1.07-17.07; P = 0.040). Our data suggest that a high plasma TMAO level upon admission may predict unfavorable clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据