4.7 Article

Direct Reprogramming of Human Neurons Identifies MARCKSL1 as a Pathogenic Mediator of Valproic Acid-Induced Teratogenicity

期刊

CELL STEM CELL
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 103-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.04.021

关键词

-

资金

  1. postdoctoral grant (Stanford) [ChEM-H112878]
  2. NIH [MH052804, MH092931]
  3. start-up funds from Colorado State University
  4. training grant from California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) [TGR-01159]
  5. Singapore Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR)
  6. CIRM fellowship
  7. Larry L. Hillblom Foundation
  8. New York Stem Cell Foundation Robertson award
  9. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Faculty Scholar award
  10. Tashia and John Morgridge Faculty Scholar award by the Child Health Research Institute (CHRI) at Stanford

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human pluripotent stem cells can be rapidly converted into functional neurons by ectopic expression of proneural transcription factors. Here we show that directly reprogrammed neurons, despite their rapid maturation kinetics, can model teratogenic mechanisms that specifically affect early neurodevelopment. We delineated distinct phases of in vitro maturation during reprogramming of human neurons and assessed the cellular phenotypes of valproic acid (VPA), a teratogenic drug. VPA exposure caused chronic impairment of dendritic morphology and functional properties of developing neurons, but not those of mature neurons. These pathogenic effects were associated with VPA-mediated inhibition of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) and glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) pathways, which caused transcriptional downregulation of many genes, including MARCKSL1, an actin-stabilizing protein essential for dendritic morphogenesis and synapse maturation during early neurodevelopment. Our findings identify a developmentally restricted pathogenic mechanism of VPA and establish the use of reprogrammed neurons as an effective platform for modeling teratogenic pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据