4.8 Article

Dynamic Risk Profiling Using Serial Tumor Biomarkers for Personalized Outcome Prediction

期刊

CELL
卷 178, 期 3, 页码 699-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.011

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01CA188298, R01CA233975, R01CA229766, U01CA194389, R25CA180993]
  2. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation [71-14, 09-16]
  3. American Society of Hematology Scholar Award
  4. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar Award
  5. V Foundation for Cancer Research Abeloff Scholar Award
  6. Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Young Investigator Award
  7. Emerson Collective Cancer Research Fund
  8. Stinehart/Reed Award
  9. Shanahan Family Fund
  10. NIH [1-DP2-CA186569]
  11. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
  12. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [ZIABC011914] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate prediction of long-term outcomes remains a challenge in the care of cancer patients. Due to the difficulty of serial tumor sampling, previous prediction tools have focused on pretreatment factors. However, emerging non-invasive diagnostics have increased opportunities for serial tumor assessments. We describe the Continuous Individualized Risk Index (CIRI), a method to dynamically determine outcome probabilities for individual patients utilizing risk predictors acquired over time. Similar to win probability models in other fields, CIRI provides a real-time probability by integrating risk assessments throughout a patient's course. Applying CIRI to patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma, we demonstrate improved outcome prediction compared to conventional risk models. We demonstrate CIRI's broader utility in analogous models of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and breast adenocarcinoma and perform a proof-of-concept analysis demonstrating how CIRI could be used to develop predictive biomarkers for therapy selection. We envision that dynamic risk assessment will facilitate personalized medicine and enable innovative therapeutic paradigms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据