4.8 Article

Commercial expanded graphite as high-performance cathode for low-cost aluminum-ion battery

期刊

CARBON
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 134-140

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.03.080

关键词

-

资金

  1. Key Research and Development Plan of Zhejiang Province [2018C01049]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51533008, 51703194, 21805242]
  3. National Key RAMP
  4. D Program of China [2016YFA0200200]
  5. Hundred Talents Program of Zhejiang University [188020*194231701/113]
  6. Excellent Postdoctoral Special Fund of Zhejiang University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aluminum-ion battery (AIB) is a very promising rechargeable battery system for its safety and three-electron-redox aluminum anode. However, the low cost-effectiveness and performance limit its practical application, thus requiring low-cost cathode-electrolyte system with large-scale manufacturing potential. In this work, we successfully achieved a low-cost and high-performance AIB system consisting of commercial expanded graphite (EG) cathode and AlCl3-triethylamine hydrochloride (AlCl3-ET) electrolyte. The assembled AIB exhibited the cathode capacity of 78.3 +/- 4.1 mAh g(-1) (156.6 +/- 8.2 mAh cm(-3)) at 5 A g(-1) with 77.5% retention after 30 000 cycles. Even at a high active material loading of 6.16 mg cm(-2), the EG cathode displayed 101 mAh g(-1) (207 mAh cm(-3)) at 1 A g(-1) with 95.5% retention after 11 500 stable cycles. We confirmed the part of the cathode capacity was contributed by AlCl4- deposition, and the reaction mechanism of our new system resulted from the special structure of EG, which served as an important supplement of the classical mechanism of AIB. The high capacity of EG-AIB was contributed by AlCl4- deposition and its stage 4 intercalation. This work provides a very promising and simple strategy for establishing the low-cost, high-performance and high-mass loading AIB system with great commercial value. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据