4.7 Article

Clinicopathological implications of TIM3+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and the miR-455-5p/Galectin-9 axis in skull base chordoma patients

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 68, 期 7, 页码 1157-1169

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-019-02349-1

关键词

Skull base chordoma; TIM3; Galectin-9; CD8; FOXp3; miR-455-5p

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81101917, 81270036, 30901736]
  2. Liaoning Province Natural Science Foundation [20170541022]
  3. Plan to Focus on Research and Development from Science and Technology project of Liaoning Province [2017225029]
  4. Science and Technology Plan Project of Shenyang City [18-014-4-11]
  5. Fund for Scientific Research of The First Hospital of China Medical University [FHCMU-FSR]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chordoma is difficult to eradicate due to high local recurrence rates. The immune microenvironment is closely associated with tumor prognosis; however, its role in skull base chordoma is unknown. The expression of Galectin-9 (Gal9) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) markers was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox analyses were used to assessing local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients. MiR-455-5p was identified as a regulator of Gal9 expression. Immunopositivity for Gal9 was associated with tumor invasion (p=0.019), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score (p=0.017), and total TIL count (p<0.001); downregulation of miR-455-5p was correlated with tumor invasion (p=0.017) and poor prognosis; and the T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain 3 (TIM3)(+) TIL count was associated with chordoma invasion (p=0.010) and KPS score (p=0.037). Furthermore, multivariate analysis indicated that only TIM3(+) TIL density was an independent prognostic factor for LRFS (p=0.010) and OS (p=0.016). These results can be used to predict clinical outcome and provide a basis for immune therapy in skull base chordoma patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据