4.5 Article

MCF-7 as a Model for Functional Analysis of Breast Cancer Risk Variants

期刊

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
卷 28, 期 10, 页码 1735-1745

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0066

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI of the NIH [R01CA190182]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Breast cancer genetic predisposition is governed by more than 142 loci as revealed by genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The functional contribution of these risk loci to breast cancer remains unclear, and additional post-GWAS analyses are required. Methods: We identified active regulatory elements (enhancers, promoters, and chromatin organizing elements) by histone H3K27 acetylation and CTCF occupancy and determined the enrichment of risk variants at these sites. We compared these results with previously published data and for other cell lines, including human mammary epithelial cells, and related these data to gene expression. Results: In terms of mapping accuracy and resolution, our data augment previous annotations of the MCF-7 epigenome. After intersection with GWAS risk variants, we found 39 enhancers and 15 CTCF occupancy sites that, between them, overlapped 96 breast cancer credible risk variants at 42 loci. These risk enhancers likely regulate the expression of dozens of genes, which are enriched for GO categories, including estrogen and prolactin signaling. Conclusions: Ten (of 142) breast cancer risk loci likely function via enhancers that are active in MCF-7 and are well suited to targeted manipulation in this system. In contrast, risk loci cannot be mapped to specific CTCF-binding sites, and the genes linked to risk CTCF sites did not show functional enrichment. The identity of risk enhancers and their associated genes suggests that some risk may function during later processes in cancer progression. Impact: Here, we report how the ERthorn cell line MCF-7 can be used to dissect risk mechanisms for breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据