4.3 Article

Co-occurrence patterns between bacterial and fungal communities in response to a vegetation gradient in a freshwater wetland

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
卷 65, 期 10, 页码 722-737

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjm-2019-0147

关键词

bacteria; co-occurrence; fungi; network; vegetation community

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31360127, 31660149, 41601337]
  2. Open Foundation of MOE Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Environment and Resource [PYH2015-13]
  3. Nanchang University [9202-0210210807]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vegetation dynamics are known to influence belowground microbial community diversity and ecosystem processes in wetlands. However, the knowledge on microbe-microbe interactions in response to vegetation changes is scarce. In this study, we investigated how bacterial and fungal community composition, as well as bacterial-fungal community interactions, altered along a vegetation gradient in the Poyang Lake wetland. Surface soil and sediment samples were collected from three vegetation zones: dense, sparse, and naked. Vegetation zones differed in terms of dominant plant species, plant diversity, and vegetation coverage. Using Illumina MiSeq sequencing and network analysis of bacteria 16S rRNA and fungal ITS genes, we found that both bacterial and fungal community profiles varied according to vegetation conditions; in particular, the dense vegetation zone facilitated higher microbial abundance and a greater fungi to bacteria ratio. Co-occurrence analysis revealed that fungi-bacteria interactions were strong on vegetated zones, especially in the dense vegetation zone. However, a weak fungi-bacteria association was observed in the naked zone. Our results indicated that aboveground vegetation may act as a hotspot for organic matter accumulation, microbial growth, and microbe-microbe interactions, whereas fungi and bacteria prefer to distribute into niches based on their own nutritional preferences and functional specificity in bare ground.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据