4.7 Article

Fault diagnosis based operation risk evaluation for air conditioning systems in data centers

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106319

关键词

Building thermal environment; Fault diagnosis; Random forest; Decoupling feature; Data center air conditioning system

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51876119]
  2. Shanghai Pujiang Program [17PJD017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The air conditioning systems in data centers are essential, energy-hungry infrastructures that can keep the rack of servers below the critical temperature limits. Faulty operation may result in increased energy usage, reduced thermal comfort, and increased maintenance costs. This paper presents a novel hybrid model based fault diagnosis and estimation approach to manage the operation risk of data center air conditioning systems. Four decoupling features are firstly developed for the typical faults of the system investigated. They are uniquely affected by individual faults and deviate from their fault-free values when their corresponding faults occur. Then the fault diagnosis model integrating the decoupling features and random forest classifier is used to identify the fault type. Subsequently, the fault intensity estimator established through the random forest regression method is used to estimate the fault severity that can represent the magnitude of operation risk. The performance of the presented models are validated by the experimental data. The results illustrate that the proposed fault diagnosis model has significant performance advantage over two pure data-driven models. It is more robust to various operation conditions that may occur in practical applications. For new operation conditions, the overall correct diagnosis rate is still 94.17%, and the false alarm rates are within 5%. In addition, the mean absolute errors of the four fault intensity estimators are less than 4%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据