4.2 Article

Mechanical evaluation of the Bravos afterloader system for HDR brachytherapy

期刊

BRACHYTHERAPY
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 852-862

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.06.005

关键词

brachytherapy; Afterloader; Commissioning

资金

  1. Varian Medical Systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: The Bravos afterloader system was released by Varian Medical Systems in October of 2018 for high-dose-rate brachytherapy with Ir-192 sources, containing new features such as the CamScale (a new device for daily quality assurance and system recalibration), channel length verification, and different settings for rigid and flexible applicators. This study mechanically evaluated the Bravos system precision and accuracy for clinically relevant scenarios, using dummy sources. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The system was evaluated after three sets of experiments: (1) The CamScale was used to verify inter- and infra-channel dwelling variability and system calibration; (2) A high-speed camera was used to verify the source simulation cable movement inside a transparent quality assurance device, where dwell positions, dwell times, transit times, speed profiles, and accelerations were measured; (3) The source movement inside clinical applicators was captured with an imaging panel while being exposed to an external kV source. Measured and planned dwell positions and times were compared. RESULTS: Maximum deviations between planned and measured dwell positions and times for the source cable were 0.4 mm for the CamScale measurements and 0.07 seconds for the high-speed camera measurements. Mean dwell position deviations inside clinical applicators were below 1.2 mm for all applicators except the ring that required an offset correction of 1 mm to achieve a mean deviation of 0.4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Features of the Bravos afterloader system provide a robust and precise treatment delivery. All measurements were within manufacturer specifications. (C) 2019 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据