4.4 Review

Methodological steps used by authors of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials: a cross-sectional study

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR

Xinyu Wu et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2018)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR

Svjetlana Dosenovic et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2018)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

PRISMA and AMSTAR show systematic reviews on health literacy and cancer screening are of good quality

Sakshi Sharma et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Extracting data from figures with software was faster, with higher interrater reliability than manual extraction

Antonia Jelicic Kadic et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed

Penny Whiting et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)

Article Transplantation

Con: Meta-analysis: some key limitations and potential solutions

Tonya M. Esterhuizen et al.

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION (2016)

Article Transplantation

Moderator's view: Meta-analysis: the best knowledge but not always shining gold

Carmine Zoccali

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION (2016)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

How to Conduct a Systematic Review: A Narrative Literature Review

Nusrat Jahan et al.

CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE (2016)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Searching for unpublished data for Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study

Jeppe Bennekou Schroll et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)

Article Urology & Nephrology

How to write a Cochrane systematic review

Lorna K. Henderson et al.

NEPHROLOGY (2010)

Article Information Science & Library Science

Semi-automating the manual literature search for systematic reviews increases efficiency

Andrea L. Chapman et al.

HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL (2010)

Editorial Material Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Systematic Reviews: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Yuhong Yuan et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY (2009)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy

Anne M. Moseley et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments

Lidwine B. Mokkink et al.

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2009)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials

J. Pildal et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2007)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

Beverley J. Shea et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2007)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews

AP Jones et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2005)

Article Computer Science, Cybernetics

Electronic survey methodology: A case study in reaching hard-to-involve Internet users

D Andrews et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION (2003)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

EM Balk et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2002)

Article Psychology, Educational

A meta-analysis of response rates in Web- or internet-based surveys

C Cook et al.

EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2000)