4.8 Article

A dynamic capacity degradation model and its applications considering varying load for a large format Li-ion battery

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 48-59

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.12.063

关键词

Lithium ion battery; Capacity degradation; State of health; Degradation model; Chemical kinetics

资金

  1. US-China Clean Energy Research Center-Clean Vehicle Consortium (CERC-CVC)
  2. MOST (Ministry of Science and Technology) of China [2014DFG71590]
  3. Department of Energy [DE-PI0000012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The capacity degradation of the lithium ion battery should be well predicted during battery system design. Therefore, high-fidelity capacity degradation models that are suitable for the task of capacity prediction are required. This paper proposes a novel capacity degradation model that can simulate the degradation dynamics under varying working conditions for large-format lithium ion batteries. The degradation model is built based on a mechanistic and prognostic model (MPM) whose parameters are closely linked with the degradation mechanisms of lithium ion batteries. Chemical kinetics was set to drive the parameters of the MPM to change as capacity degradation continues. With the dynamic parameters of the MPM, the capacity predicted by the degradation model decreases as the cycle continues. Accelerated aging tests were conducted on three types of commercial lithium ion batteries to calibrate the capacity degradation model. The good fit with the experimental data indicates that the model can capture the degradation mechanisms well for different types of commercial lithium ion batteries. Furthermore, the calibrated model can be used to (1) evaluate the longevity of a battery system under a specific working load and (2) predict the evolution of cell variations within a battery pack when different cell works at different conditions. Correlated applications are discussed using the calibrated degradation model. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据