4.6 Article

Analysis of networks of host proteins in the early time points following HIV transduction

期刊

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-2990-3

关键词

Weighted network; Quantitative proteomics; Host response; HIV-1

资金

  1. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [NKFI-6, 125238]
  2. Higher Education Institutional Excellence Programme of the Ministry of Human Capacities in Hungary [GINOP-2.3.3-15-2016-00020]
  3. Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  4. NIEHS [ES06694]
  5. NIH/NCI [CA023074]
  6. BIO5 Institute of the University of Arizona
  7. NIH/NCRR [1S10 RR028868-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundUtilization of quantitative proteomics data on the network level is still a challenge in proteomics data analysis. Currently existing models use sophisticated, sometimes hard to implement analysis techniques. Our aim was to generate a relatively simple strategy for quantitative proteomics data analysis in order to utilize as much of the data generated in a proteomics experiment as possible.ResultsIn this study, we applied label-free proteomics, and generated a network model utilizing both qualitative, and quantitative data, in order to examine the early host response to Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1). A weighted network model was generated based on the amount of proteins measured by mass spectrometry, and analysis of weighted networks and functional sub-networks revealed upregulation of proteins involved in translation, transcription, and DNA condensation in the early phase of the viral life-cycle.ConclusionA relatively simple strategy for network analysis was created and applied to examine the effect of HIV-1 on host cellular proteome. We believe that our model may prove beneficial in creating algorithms, allowing for both quantitative and qualitative studies of proteome change in various biological and pathological processes by quantitative mass spectrometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据