4.0 Article

Influence of quality of sleep in the first trimester on blood pressure in the third trimester in primipara women

期刊

BLOOD PRESSURE
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 345-355

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08037051.2019.1637246

关键词

Home blood pressure measurement; hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; primipara PSQI-J; sleep quality; blood pressure

资金

  1. Japan Society of Private Colleges and Universities of Nursing [44]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between decreased sleep quality during the first trimester and a rise in blood pressure during an otherwise normal course of pregnancy in primipara women.Materials and methods: We recruited 128 pregnant women (primipara) who visited the obstetrics and gynecology clinic for medical examination, of which 89 were longitudinally investigated from the first to the third trimester after obtaining informed consent. A survey was conducted in the first, second, and third trimesters to evaluate sleep quality using the Japanese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-J). Patients were assigned to either a good sleep quality group (PSQI-J <= 5) or a poor sleep quality group (PSQI-J >= 6). Blood pressure was measured using a home blood pressure measurement method. We analyzed the relationship between sleep quality in the first trimester and blood pressure during pregnancy.Results: The increase in morning systolic blood pressure from first to third trimester was larger in the poor sleep quality group than in the good sleep quality group (7.17.0 vs. 3.0 +/- 5.6mmHg, p<.01). Sleep latency (r=0.38, beta=0.43, p=.02) and sleep disturbances (r=0.24, beta=0.33, p=.04) in the first trimester affected the increase in systolic blood pressure during pregnancy.Conclusions: Understanding sleep quality at the beginning of pregnancy can help predict a rise in systolic blood pressure in the third trimester. This emphasizes the importance of sleep education during pregnancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据