4.7 Article

Combined inhibition of Bcl-2 and NFκB synergistically induces cell death in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

期刊

BLOOD
卷 134, 期 5, 页码 445-455

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2019001545

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [NI1407/1-2]
  2. Wilhelm-Sander-Stiftung [2012.077.1/2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Therapeutic options for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) are limited and curative treatment regimens are not available. Thus, new targeted and well-tolerated therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. In this respect, we have recently shown that dimethyl fumerate (DMF) inhibits NF-kappa B acting as a survival factor in CTCL. Similarly, inhibition of the antiapoptotic protein B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) has been shown to induce cell death in CTCL especially when combined with histone deacetylase inhibitors. Therefore, we hypothesized that inhibition of Bcl-2 should potentiate NF-kappa B inhibition in a novel combination treatment of CTCL. We show that, in vitro, the Bcl-2 inhibitors ABT-199 and ABT-263 induced specific cell death in primary CD4(+) cells from CTCL patients as well as in the CTCL cell line SeAx, but not in T cells of healthy donors nor in the CTCL cell line HH, which lacks Bcl-2. Combined treatment with ABT-199 and DMF caused synergistic cell death specifically in CTCL cells engaging 2 independent signaling pathways. To verify these findings in vivo, we performed combined ABT-199 and DMF treatment in a xenograft mouse model for CTCL. The combined treatment effectively reduced tumor growth and increased overall survival via synergistic induction of CTCL cell death and suppression of tumor cell proliferation. Essentially, the combination treatment was superior to ABT-199 monotherapy with respect to both efficacy and tolerability. To sum up, our data provide proof of principle for the therapeutic potential of combining Bcl-2 and NF-kappa B inhibitors in treating CTCL. Next, this potential should be explored further in a clinical study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据