4.8 Article

Fuel cell electric vehicle as a power plant and SOFC as a natural gas reformer: An exergy analysis of different system designs

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 173, 期 -, 页码 13-28

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.107

关键词

SOFC; Reforming; Vehicle-to-grid (V2G); Exergy; Trigeneration

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for the Science and Technology (FCT) [SFRH/BD/77042/2011]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/77042/2011] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Delft University of Technology, under its Green Village programme, has, an initiative to build a power plant (car parking lot) based on the fuel cells used in vehicles for motive power. It is a trigeneration system capable of producing electricity, heat, and hydrogen. It comprises three main zones: a hydrogen production zone, a parking zone, and a pump station zone. This study focuses mainly on the hydrogen production zone which assesses four different system designs in two different operation modes of the facility: Car as Power Plant (CaPP) mode, corresponding to the open period of the facility which uses fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) as energy and water producers while parked; and Pump mode, corresponding to the closed period which compresses the hydrogen and pumps to the vehicle's fuel tank. These system designs differ by the reforming technology: the existing catalytic reformer (CR) and a solid oxide fuel cell operating as reformer (SOFCR); and the option of integrating a carbon capture and storage (CCS). Results reveal that the SOFCR unit significantly reduces the exergy destruction resulting in an improvement of efficiency over 20% in SOFCR-based system designs compared to CR-based system designs in both operation modes. It also mitigates the reduction in system efficiency by integration of a CCS unit, achieving a value of 2% whereas, in CR-based systems, is 7-8%. The SOFCR-based system running in Pump mode achieves a trigeneration efficiency of 60%. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据