期刊
BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 151-159出版社
ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.04.013
关键词
authentication; food adulteration; process analytical technologies; chicken
资金
- Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]
- Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)
- Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [404852/2016-5]
- Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2015/24351-2]
- FAPESP [2008/57808-1, 2014/50951-4]
- CNPq [465768/2014-8]
- Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [14/50951-4] Funding Source: FAPESP
Computer vision and near infrared spectroscopy are fast and non-invasive techniques currently available for processing control in the meat industry. These techniques can be used, either separately or combined, for on-line assessment of meat quality parameters. This study aimed to compare a portable near-infrared (NIR) spectrometer, near infrared hyperspectral imaging (NIR-HSI) and red, green and blue imaging (RGB-I) to differentiate ground samples from beef, pork and chicken meat; and to quantify amounts of each in mixtures. Chicken breast meat was adulterated with either pork leg meat or beef round meat from 0 to 50% (w/w). Partial Least Squares regression (PLSR) models were performed using full spectra and after selecting most important wavelengths. The best results were obtained with NIR-HSI, with coefficient of prediction (R-p(2)) of 0.83 and 0.94, ratio performance to deviation (RPD) of 1.96 and 3.56, and ratio of error range (RER) of 10.0 and 18.1, for samples of chicken adulterated with pork and beef, respectively. In addition, the results obtained using NIR spectroscopy and RGB-I confirm that these techniques provide an alternative for rapid, on-line inspection of ground meat in the food industry. (C) 2019 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据