4.8 Article

Introducing bifunctional metal-organic frameworks to the construction of a novel ratiometric fluorescence sensor for screening acid phosphatase activity

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 133-139

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.05.010

关键词

Metal-organic frameworks; Biomimetic catalyst; Luminescent sensor; Ratiometric fluorescence; Acid phosphatase; Logic gate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51678485]
  2. Edanz Group China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Restricted to single sensing mechanisms, most luminescent metal-organic framework (LMOF)-based sensors were constructed for detection of limited targets. Here, a new biosensor is described for screening acid phosphatase (ACP) activity via bifunctional NH2-MIL-101 MOFs acting as both fluorescent indicator and biomimetic catalyst. NH2-MIL-101 possesses an inherent fluorescence emission at 456 nm (F-456). As a peroxidase-like nanozyme, it catalyzes oxidation of o-phenylenediamine (OPD) by H2O2 to generate fluorescent 2,3-diaminophenazine with the maximum emission at 556 nm (F-556). Upon introducing NH2-MIL-101 into a mixture of OPD and H2O2, F-456 is quenched, while F-556 increases. The ACP sensing is based on pyrophosphate ion (PPi) mediated fluorescence tuning of the NH2-MIL-101/OPD/H2O2 system. PPi inhibits the NH2-MIL-101 catalytic ability by specific binding to its Fe center, while ACP addition recovers the activity by hydrolyzing PPi. Upon addition of PPi and ACP into the NH2-MIL-101/OPD/H2O2 system, a ratiometric luminescence signal (F-556/F-456) is obtained, and a ratiometric fluorescent sensor can be developed for the sensitive detection of PPi and for screening ACP activity. Plots of F-556/F-456 vs. ACP concentration were linear over 0.01-30 U/L, with a detection limit of 0.005 U/L. The proposed sensor was successfully used for ACP detection in serum samples. This ratiometric fluorescence assay will open new applications for LMOF-based biosensors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据