4.7 Article

Design of hybrid molecules as antimycobacterial compounds: Synthesis of isoniazid-naphthoquinone derivatives and their activity against susceptible and resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 27, 期 18, 页码 4143-4150

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2019.07.045

关键词

Quinone; Isoniazid-naphthoquinone derivatives; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Tuberculosis; Hybrid molecules; Antimycobacterial compounds

资金

  1. CNPq [404466/2016-8, PQ 305741/2017-9, 474767/2013-2]
  2. FAPEMIG [PPM-00638-16]
  3. Capes-Humboldt research fellowship programme for experienced researchers [88881.145517/2017-01]
  4. FAPEMIG (Rede de Pesquisa e Inovacao para Bioengenharia de Nanossistemas) [RED-00282-16]
  5. [Capes-AUX PE-PNPD-2929/2011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Isoniazid-naphthoquinone hybrids were synthesized and evaluated against a susceptible (H(37)Rv) strain and two isoniazid-resistant strains (INHR1 and INHR2) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The antimycobacterial activity of the derivatives was determined based on the resazurin microtiter assay and their cytotoxicity in adhered mouse monocyte macrophage J774.A1 cells (ATCC TIB-67). Of the twenty-two compounds evaluated against the three strains of M. tuberculosis, twenty-one presented some activity against the H(37)Rv and INHR1 (katG S315T) or INHR2 (inhA C( - 5)T) strains. Compounds la, 2a, and 8a were effective against the INHR1 strain, and compounds la, 1b, 2a, 3a, 5a, 5b and 8a were effective against the INHR2 strain, with MICs in the range of 3.12-6.25 mu g/mL. Compounds 1b and 5b were the most active against H 37 Rv, with MIC of 0.78 mu g/mL. Based on the selectivity index, 1b and 5b can be considered safe as a drug candidate compounds. These results demonstrate that quinoidal compounds can be used as promising scaffolds for the development of new anti-TB drugs and hybrids with activity against M. tuberculosis-susceptible and INH-resistant strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据