4.5 Article

Image-based analysis and simulation of the effect of platelet storage temperature on clot mechanics under uniaxial strain

期刊

BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 173-187

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-019-01203-8

关键词

Platelet storage; Fibrin networks; Tensile stress; Principal component analysis

资金

  1. AHA Institutional Research Enhancement Award (AIREA) program of the American Heart Association [18AIREA33960524]
  2. Kordestani Foundation at San Jose State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optimal strength and stability of blood clots are keys to hemostasis and in prevention of hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications. Clots are biocomposite materials composed of fibrin network enmeshing platelets and other blood cells. We have previously shown that the storage temperature of platelets significantly impacts clot structure and stiffness. The objective of this work is to delineate the relationship between morphological characteristics and mechanical response of clot networks. We examined scanning electron microscope images of clots prepared from fresh apheresis platelets, and from apheresis platelets stored for 5 days at room temperature or at 4 degrees C, suspended in pooled plasma. Principal component analysis of nine different morphometric parameters revealed that a single principal component (PC1) can distinguish the effect of platelet storage on clot ultrastructure. Finite element analysis of clot response to uniaxial strain was used to map the spatially heterogeneous distribution of strain energy density for each clot. At modest deformations (25% strain), a single principal component (PC2) was able to predict these heterogeneities as quantified by variability in strain energy density distribution and in linear elastic stiffness, respectively. We have identified structural parameters that are primary regulators of stress distribution, and the observations provide insights into the importance of spatial heterogeneity on hemostasis and thrombosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据