4.7 Article

Assessment of residential wood energy consumption using German household-level data

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 117-129

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.04.020

关键词

Wood energy; Renewable energy; Residential sector; Household demand; Tobit model; Germany

资金

  1. Holzabsatzfonds (HAF)
  2. Verband der Deutschen Sage-und Holzindustrie (VDS)
  3. VDP-Forschungsrat (INFOR)
  4. Verband Deutscher Papierfabriken (VDP)
  5. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Rohholzverbraucher e. V. (AGR)
  6. Bundesindustrieverband Deutschland Haus-, Energie-und Umwelttechnik e. V. (BDH)
  7. Bundesverband der Altholzaufbereiter und -verwerter e. V. (BAV)
  8. Bundesverband Sage-und Holzindustrie Deutschland e. V. (BSHD)
  9. Deutscher Energieholz-und Pellet-Verband e. V. (DEPV)
  10. Gesamtverband Deutscher Holzhandel e. V. (GDHolz)
  11. Industrieverband Haus-, Heiz-und Kuchentechnik e. V. (HKI)
  12. Verband der Deutschen Holzwerkstoffindustrie e. V. (VHI)
  13. Verband der Deutschen Sage-und Holzindustrie e. V. (VDS)
  14. Verband Deutscher Papierfabriken e. V. (VDP)
  15. Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e. V. (FNR) under the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture in Germany [22021614]
  16. University of Hamburg through the MIN Graduate School International project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The residential sector accounts for about half of annual wood energy consumption in Germany. We applied a left-censored Tobit model to a cross-sectional dataset to quantify factors affecting household-level German residential wood energy consumption in years 2005, 2010 and 2014. Explanatory variables distinguished between (1) heating technology, dwelling characteristics and alternative energies; (2) woody biomass accessibility and weather; as well as (3) households' socio demographic characteristics. Results show that wood energy consuming households with central heaters used an additional 0.83-1.82 m(3) year(-1) of wood. Households' wood energy consumption showed a positive correlation with residence area and elastic responses to year of building construction. Greater elasticities in wood energy consumption were found when alternative energy prices exceeded US$ 1,050-1,330 per ton of oil-equivalent net calorific value. Local accessibility of woody biomass measured through forest ownership and forest density was associated with greater wood for energy consumption by an average 0.27-0.52 m(3) year(-1) and 0.13-0.25 m(3) year(-1), respectively. In addition, wood energy consumption increased proportionally with increasing rurality. Elasticity of household wood energy consumption with respect to heating degree days was estimated at 0.83-1.15. Among demographic variables, households at lower and higher income levels exhibited greater amounts of wood energy consumption. Results provide evidence that greater adoption of central wood energy heaters, price competitiveness of wood energy over alternative energies, and improving access to wood energy sources can lead to greater residential wood energy consumption in Germany.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据