4.8 Article

DiameterJ: A validated open source nanofiber diameter measurement tool

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 327-338

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.015

关键词

ImageJ; Image analysis; FIJI; Scaffold; Morphology; Structure

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [ZIA EY000531-02, Z99 EY999999] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [ZIAEY000533, ZIAEY000542] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the growing use of nanofiber scaffolds for tissue engineering applications, there is not a validated, readily available, free solution for rapid, automated analysis of nanofiber diameter from scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrographs. Thus, the goal of this study was to create a user friendly ImageJ/FIJI plugin that would analyze SEM micrographs of nanofibers to determine nanofiber diameter on a desktop computer within 60 s. Additional design goals included 1) compatibility with a variety of existing segmentation algorithms, and 2) an open source code to enable further improvement of the plugin. Using existing algorithms for centerline determination, Euclidean distance transforms and a novel pixel transformation technique, a plugin called DiameterJ was created for ImageJ/FIJI. The plugin was validated using 1) digital synthetic images of white lines on a black background and 2) SEM images of nominally monodispersed steel wires of known diameters. DiameterJ analyzed SEM micrographs in 20 s, produced diameters not statistically different from known values, was over 10-times closer to known diameter values than other open source software, provided hundreds of times the sampling of manual measurement, and was hundreds of times faster than manual assessment of nanofiber diameter. DiameterJ enables users to rapidly and thoroughly determine the structural features of nanofiber scaffolds and could potentially allow new insights to be formed into fiber diameter distribution and cell response. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据