4.8 Article

Intelligent analysis of energy consumption in school buildings

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 416-429

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.12.072

关键词

Electricity; District heating; Smart metering; Energy efficiency; School buildings; Data analysis

资金

  1. Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovations (Tekes)
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  3. INSULAVO project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Even though industry consumes nearly half of total energy production, the relative share of total energy consumption related to heating and operating buildings is growing constantly. The motivation for this study was to reveal the differences in electricity use and district heating consumption in school buildings of various ages during the working day and also during the night when human-based consumption is low. The overall aim of this study is to compare the energy (electricity and heating) consumption of six school buildings in Kuopio, Eastern Finland. The selected school buildings were built in different decades, and their ventilation and building automation systems are also inconsistent. The hourly energy consumption data was received from Kuopion Energia, the local energy supply company. In this paper, the results of data analysis on the energy consumption in these school buildings are presented. Preliminary results show that, generally speaking, new school buildings are more energy-efficient than older ones. However, concerning energy efficiency, two very new schools were exceptional because ventilation was on day and night in order to dry the building materials in the constructions. The novelty of this study is that it makes use of hourly smart metering consumption data on electricity and district heating, using modern computational methods to analyse complex multivariate data in order to increase knowledge of the buildings' consumption profiles and energy efficiency. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据