4.7 Article

The Electroretinogram May Differentiate Schizophrenia From Bipolar Disorder

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 87, 期 3, 页码 263-270

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.06.014

关键词

Biomarker; Bipolar disorders; Electroretinogram; Psychosis; Retina; Schizophrenia

资金

  1. Consortium Quebecois sur la Recherche du Medicament (CQDM), a biopharmaceutical research consortium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The retina is recognized as an approachable part of the brain owing to their common embryonic origin. The electroretinogram (ERG) has proved to be a valuable tool to investigate psychiatric disorders. We therefore investigated its accuracy as a tool to differentiate schizophrenia (SZ) from bipolar disorder (BP) even after balancing patients for their main antipsychotic medication. METHODS: ERG cone and rod luminance response functions were recorded in 150 patients with SZ and 151 patients with BP and compared with 200 control subjects. We created a subgroup of subjects-45 with SZ and 45 with BP-balanced for their main antipsychotic medication. RESULTS: A reduced cone a-wave amplitude and a prolonged b-wave latency were observed in both disorders, whereas a reduced cone b-wave amplitude was present in SZ only. Reduced mixed rod-cone a- and b-wave amplitudes were observed in both disorders. Patients with SZ were distinguishable from control subjects with 0.91 accuracy, 77% sensitivity, and 91% specificity with similar numbers for patients with BP (0.89, 76%, and 88%, respectively). Patients with SZ and patients with BP could be differentiated with an accuracy of 0.86 (whole sample) and 0.83 (subsamples of 45 patients with 80% sensitivity and 82% specificity). Antipsychotic dosages were not correlated with ERG parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The ERG waveform parameters used in this study provided a very accurate distinction between the two disorders when using a logistic regression model. This supports the ERG as a tool that could aid the clinician in the differential diagnosis of SZ and BP in stabilized medicated patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据