4.3 Article

Evaluation of Oryza coarctata candidate reference genes under different abiotic stresses

期刊

BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 496-503

出版社

ACAD SCIENCES CZECH REPUBLIC, INST EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
DOI: 10.32615/bp.2019.054

关键词

abscisic acid; cold; drought; gene expression; halophyte; heat; salinity; submergence

资金

  1. Council of Scientific & Industrial Research, India
  2. DST, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oryza coarctata Roxb. is a wild halophytic species found mostly on South Asian seashore. It can tolerate salinity up to 4 S m(-1), which is equivalent to 479 mM NaCl. This species has unique morphological, anatomical, as well as physiological adaptations, which helps it to survive under high salinity and submerged conditions. Thus, it is considered to be a reservoir of salinity and submergence tolerance genes. For quantification of gene expressions, it is necessary to identify stable reference genes and validate stress responsive genes by real time quantitative PCR. The present study deals with the expression analyses of eight candidate reference genes, namely, ubiquitin 2, histone 3, beta-tubulin, alpha-tubulin, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, eukaryotic initiation factor 4-alpha (eIF4-alpha), cyclophilin, and actin (ACT) under different abiotic stresses such as salinity, cold, drought, heat, submergence, submergence with saline water (dual stress), and abscisic acid treatment. The four different statistical algorithms, namely, Bestkeeper, NormFinder, geNorm, and RefFinder were used to rank the genes in order of stability. The analysis revealed that ACT and eIF4-alpha were the two most stable reference genes, which was further validated by determining the expressions of two well-known stress responsive genes alcohol dehydrogenase and dehydration responsive element binding protein 2A under submergence and drought stress, respectively. This study is the first report to analyse the reference genes for O. coarctata.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据