4.7 Review

Understanding the Chemical Nature of Nanoparticle-Protein Interactions

期刊

BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 1923-1937

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00348

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFA0201600, 2016YFE0133100]
  2. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [11621505]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31700879]
  4. CAS Key Research Program for Frontier Sciences [QYZDJ-SSW-SLH022]
  5. CAS interdisciplinary innovation team
  6. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [11425520]
  7. CAS-TWAS President's Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The formation of a protein corona has been considered a pitfall in the clinical translation of nanomedicines. Hence, interdisciplinary studies on corona characterization are critically essential. A deep understanding of the formation of hard and soft protein coronas upon in vivo administration of nanoparticles is vital. The protein corona gives the nanoplatform a new biological identity. Furthermore, the control of and mechanistic understanding of corona formation as it is regulated by the physicochemical properties of nanoparticles is crucial for developing safe nanomedicines. A growing number of analytical techniques have been developed in the past decade for examining NP-protein interactions, contributing to a better understanding of protein corona formation on the surface of nanoparticles. In this Review, we summarize the latest developments in the in vivo and in vitro study of dynamic protein corona formation. Insights derived from techniques used to visualize, quantify, and define protein coronas, as well as the methods for examining the kinetics and structural changes of coronal proteins, are discussed. The potential challenges and future perspectives in the study of protein corona formation and its effects on biological behavior and applications of therapeutic nanomaterials are also provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据