4.6 Article

Angiotensin II downregulates vascular endothelial cell hydrogen sulfide production by enhancing cystathionine γ-lyase degradation through ROS-activated ubiquitination pathway

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.05.021

关键词

AngII; Hydrogen sulfide; Superoxide; Ubiquitin; Vascular endothelial

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81622004, 81670395]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7171010]
  3. Changjiang Scholar Program of the Ministry of Education of China
  4. National Youth Top-notch Talent Support Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interactions between vasoactive peptides and gasotransmitters have attracted considerable attention from scientists. However, the impact of angiotensin II (AngII) on the endogenous hydrogen sulfide/cystathionine gamma-lyase (H2S/CSE) pathway in vascular endothelial cells remains unclear. In this study, we found, for the first time, that AngII downregulated the endogenous H2S/CSE pathway in a time-dependent manner. Mechanistically, AngII accelerated the degradation of the CSE protein and shortened its half-life in endothelial cells. AngII significantly induced Lys48 (K48)-linked CSE ubiquitination and subsequent CSE degradation but did not affect Lys63 (K63)-linked CSE ubiquitination in vascular endothelial cells. Treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 and mutation of Lys48 to Arg in ubiquitin successfully blunted the inhibitory effects of AngII on the endogenous H2S/CSE pathway in vascular endothelial cells. Furthermore, we found that superoxide anion levels were significantly increased in AngII-treated endothelial cells compared with controls and that the ROS scavenger N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) significantly abolished CSE ubiquitination. Taken together, our data suggested that AngII inhibited endogenous H2S generation through ubiquitination-mediated CSE degradation via the ROS pathway in vascular endothelial cells. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据