4.8 Article

Integrated techno-economic and environmental assessments of sixty scenarios for co-firing biomass with coal and natural gas

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 169, 期 -, 页码 433-449

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.018

关键词

Biomass co-firing; Coal; Natural gas; GHG emissions; Power generation; Techno-economic assessment

资金

  1. NSERC/Cenovus/Alberta Innovates Associate Industrial Research Chair Program in Energy and Environmental Systems Engineering
  2. Cenovus Energy Endowed Chair Program in Environmental Engineering at the University of Alberta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Displacement of fossil fuel-based power through biomass co-firing could reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from fossil fuels. In this study, data-intensive techno-economic models were developed to evaluate different co-firing technologies as well as the configurations of these technologies. The models Were developed to study 60 different scenarios involving various biomass feedstocks (wood chips, wheat straw, and forest residues) co-fired either with coal in a 500 MW subcritical pulverized coal (PC) plant or with natural gas in a 500 MW natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) plant to determine their technical potential and costs, as well as to determine environmental benefits. The results obtained reveal that the fully paid-off coal-fired power plant co-fired with forest residues is the most attractive option, having levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) of $53.12-$54.50/MW h and CO2 abatement costs of $27.41-$31.15/tCO(2). When whole forest chips are co-fired with coal in a fully paid-off plant, the LCOE and CO2 abatement costs range from $54.68 to $56.41/MW h and $35.60 to $41.78/tCO(2), respectively. The LCOE and CO2 abatement costs for straw range from $54.62 to $57.35/MW h and $35.07 to $38.48/tCO(2), respectively. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据