4.7 Article

Assimilating Himawari-8 AHI aerosol observations with a rapid-update data assimilation system

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 215, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116866

关键词

Himawari-8 satellite; Aerosol optical depth; Data assimilation; Dust storm

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China, China [2017YFC1502100, 2016YFA0602302]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [41430427, 41675082, G41805016, G41805070]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20160954, BK20170940]
  5. Joint Open Project of KLME & CIC-FEMD, NUIST of China [KLME201807, KLME201808]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Himawari-8, a next-generation geostationary meteorological satellite, is equipped with the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) that provides full-disk images of Earth every 10 min for 16 observation bands from visible to infrared. In this study, the capability to assimilate AHI Aerosol optical depth (AOD) has been developed within the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) system with an hourly cycling configuration and application to a dust storm over East Asia during 5-7 May 2017. Analyses were produced hourly, and 24 h forecasts were produced every 6 h within the Weather Research and Forecasting with Chemistry model. It was found that the mean bias and root-mean-square error (RMSE) after data assimilation is obviously reduced (by about 30%) when compared to the control experiment which didn't assimilate any observations during the dust storm period, which verified the positive effects of AOD data assimilation systems. In addition, aerosol analyses and forecasts with AOD data assimilation were substantially improved when compared to independent AOD observations from AERONET sites. Therefore, the AOD data assimilation system developed here could be used as a tool to generate better dust storm forecasts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据