4.8 Article

Cost and potential of energy conservation and collaborative pollutant reduction in the iron and steel industry in China

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 171-183

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.094

关键词

Iron and steel; Energy conservation; Pollutant emission reduction; Supply curves

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Support Programme [2014BAC22B06]
  2. Environmental Welfare Project of the Ministry of Environmental Protection of China [201509021]
  3. Key Consulting Project of the Chinese Academy of Engineering [2014-ZD-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the cost and potential of energy conservation and collaborative pollutant emission reduction in the iron and steel industry in China. A total of 24 technologies were selected, and their investments, operation costs, energy saving benefits, abatement benefits, abatement coefficients and popularising rates were collected and calculated using the 2013 data as the baseline. A new parameter, AP(eq), reflecting the characteristics of energy conservation and multi-pollutant collaborative emission reduction was set up. The conservation and emission reduction supply curves (CERSCs) were analysed. These 24 technologies resulted in the abatement of SO2, NOx, PM10, CO2 and AP(eq) to 621.6 kt, 398.9 kt, 390.2 kt, 291.1 Mt and 699.5 kt,, respectively. The influences of discount rates and weight factors on the abatement supply curves were also discussed. Results show that, with the increase in the discount rate, the abatement costs increase and the amount of that abatement cost below zero decreases. Finally, the pollutant reductions in three key areas in China were analysed. The reduction potentials of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta are 107, 79 and 13 kt, respectively, and the corresponding abatement costs are 7.52,-51.54 and -1.76 billion Yuan. Policymalcers can choose suitable and economic technologies according to the calculation of the CERSCs. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据