4.8 Article

Thermal performance of a window shutter containing PCM: Numerical validation and experimental analysis

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 179, 期 -, 页码 64-84

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.126

关键词

Heat transfer; Phase change material (PCM); Simulation; Thermal energy storage (TES); Thermal performance; Validation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present paper describes a numerical and experimental testing of a thermal energy storage system (TES) that contains phase change material (PCM). The definitions and assumptions of the developed numerical models to assess the performance and to simulate the thermal energy behavior are presented. The numerical calculation was performed using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis, and a real scale test cell with two window shutters, one with and the other without phase change materials, was used to validate the numerical model. The windows shutters were applied into two similar compartments that were tested and the thermal behavior was analyzed. The numerical models are based on 2D analysis and the indoor temperature comparison between the experimental and the simulated model are evaluated for both compartment models. To validate and evaluate the data agreement of the numerical results were used the most common statistical indexes (based on ASHRAE, IPMVP) and FEMP). According to the used criteria acceptance, the results of the numerical model presented good agreement and reliability, and the numerical model was considered as calibrated with well prediction data. Comparing the temperature improvement and the time delay between both compartments, the compartment with the PCM window shutter (i) decreased the maximum indoor temperature up to 8.7% for the warming period, (ii) increased 16.7% the minimum indoor temperature for the night period and (iii) increased the time delay 1 h for the maximum temperature peak and 30 min for the minimum temperature peak, compared with the reference compartment. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据