4.7 Article

18.78% hierarchical black silicon solar cells achieved with the balance of light-trapping and interfacial contact

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 478, 期 -, 页码 725-732

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST 106-2221-E-006-240, MOST 107-2221-E-006-013-MY3]
  2. Hierarchical Green-Energy Materials (Hi-GEM) Research Center, from The Featured Areas Research Center Program
  3. Ministry of Education (MOE)
  4. Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan [MOST 107-3017-F-006- 003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

18.78% efficiency of crystalline silicon (Si) solar cells was achieved through introducing the combined nanopore/pyramid textures. These hierarchical structures possessed the ultra-low reflectivity with values <6% under the various illumination angles from 0 to 60 degrees, evidencing their remarkable omnidirectional light-trapping capability. Although the greatly improved light-trapping effect of the hierarchical structures was demonstrated, we found that the increased formation durations of Si nanopores led the substantial increase of photoluminescent characteristics that could limit the efficient separation of photogenerated carriers through charge recombination. Moreover, the positive correlation in surface roughness of nanopore arrays with respect to the elongated etching durations was evidenced, and these issues could increase the series resistance of solar cells owing to poor interfacial contact between nanopores and front electrodes. Thus, there existed the optimal combination between two-scale textures critically for both photonic and electrical management of cell design. By optimizing the etching durations for the controlled nanopore formation, the improved light-trapping characteristics and fairly unchanged contact resistance with front electrode was achieved, possessing the improved conversion efficiency with >0.58% of increased value beyond the typical microtexture-based solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据