4.7 Article

Mesoporous Ni/MeOx (Me = Al, Mg, Ti, and Si): Highly efficient catalysts in the decomposition of methane for hydrogen production

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 478, 期 -, 页码 581-593

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.009

关键词

Methane decomposition; Hydrogen production; Mesoporous support; Supported Ni catalyst; Multi-walled carbon filament

资金

  1. Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) [97017638]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The concurrent production of COx-free hydrogen and multi-walled carbon filaments by thermocatalytic decomposition of methane is advantageous in the environmental and energy catalysis. In the present work, a facile one-pot evaporation-induced self-assembly strategy was effectively adopted to fabricate the nickel catalysts supported on mesoporous Al2O3, SiO2, TiO2, and MgO, and their catalytic activities for methane decomposition were evaluated for the first time. The structural, textural, and redox properties of the as-obtained materials were characterized using a number of analytical techniques. The nitrogen sorption analysis indicated the presence of a mesoporous structure due to homogeneous aggregation of the catalyst particles with a high specific surface area of 32-236 m(2)/g. Among all of the catalysts, Ni/MgO exhibited the best catalytic activity for methane decomposition (65% methane conversion at 600 degrees C and GHSV of 48,000 mL/(g h)). The activity increased when Ni loading increased from 25 to 55 wt%. The investigation on the correlation between catalytic performance and promoter doping effect suggests that incorporating copper into the MgO support considerably enhanced the catalytic activity and stability at high temperatures. The XPS results reveal that doping of Cu to Ni/MgO enhanced the adsorption and activation of oxygen molecules. In addition, the disordered crystalline carbon filaments with different diameters and good crystallinity were generated on the surface of the Cu-doped Ni/MgO catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据