4.8 Article

A dynamic organic Rankine cycle using a zeotropic mixture as the working fluid with composition tuning to match changing ambient conditions

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 581-591

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.014

关键词

Organic Rankine cycle; Zeotropic mixture; Dynamic composition tuning; Distillation; Economic analysis

资金

  1. Royal Society [RG130051]
  2. EPSRC in the United Kingdom [EP/N005228/1]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N005228/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/N005228/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Air-cooled condensers are widely used for Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) power plants where cooling water is unavailable or too costly, but they are then vulnerable to changing ambient air temperatures especially in continental climates, where the air temperature difference between winter and summer can be over 40 degrees C. A conventional ORC system using a single component working fluid has to be designed according to the maximum air temperature in summer and thus operates far from optimal design conditions for most of the year, leading to low annual average efficiencies. This research proposes a novel dynamic ORC that uses a binary zeotropic mixture as the working fluid, with mechanisms in place to adjust the mixture composition dynamically during operation in response to changing heat sink conditions, significantly improving the overall efficiency of the plant. The working principle of the dynamic ORC concept is analysed. The case study results show that the annual average thermal efficiency can be improved by up to 23% over a conventional ORC when the heat source is 100 degrees C, while the evaluated increase of the capital cost is less than 7%. The dynamic ORC power plants are particularly attractive for low temperature applications, delivering shorter payback periods compared to conventional ORC systems. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据