4.8 Article

Effects of capillary-assisted tubes with different fin geometries on the performance of a low-operating pressure evaporator for adsorption cooling system applications

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 256-265

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.070

关键词

Capillary-assisted evaporation; Enhanced tube; Low-operating pressure; Adsorption cooling system; Waste heat recovery

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through the Automotive Partnership Canada [APCPJ 401826-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the performance of a low-operating pressure evaporator using capillary-assisted tubes for adsorption cooling systems (ACS). When using water as a refrigerant in an ACS, the operating pressure is low (<5 kPa) and the performance of the system is severely affected when using conventional evaporators. This problem can be addressed by using capillary-assisted evaporators. A custom-built apparatus for evaluating cooling power is used to test five types of enhanced tubes with different fin geometries. Tests were performed with 10-20 degrees C chilled water inlet temperatures and water vapor pressures of 0.5-0.8 kPa. The results show that the capillary-assisted tubes provide 1.6-2.2 times greater heat transfer rate compared to a plain tube. Comparing tubes with equivalent inner surface areas (0.049 m(2)/m) and equivalent outer surface areas (0.193 m(2)/m), and different fin heights indicates that tubes with 1.42 mm parallel continuous fins (26 fins per inch (FPI)) have a 13% higher heat transfer coefficient than those with 0.9 mm fins (40 FPI). The effects of refrigerant height, dead volume inside the evaporator and chilled water mass flow rate on the performance of evaporator are studied. The heat transfer rate increases by 65% when the water height to tube diameter ratio decreased from 1.8 to less than 1. Increasing the chilled water mass flow rate from 2.5 to 15.3 kg/min (6.1 times higher) increases evaporator heat transfer coefficient by 110%. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据