4.6 Review

Mechanics of Strong and Tough Cellulose Nanopaper

期刊

APPLIED MECHANICS REVIEWS
卷 71, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4044018

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC [11732012]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018T111041, 2018M631142]
  3. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2019JQ-023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellulose nanopaper, which consists of a porous network of cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs), exhibits excellent mechanical properties with high strength and toughness. The physical mechanisms, including a realizable reduction of defect size in the nanopaper and facile formation/reformation of hydrogen bonds among CNFs, suggest a bottom-up material design strategy to address the conflict between strength and toughness. A thorough exploration of the rich potential of such a design strategy requires a fundamental understanding of its mechanical behavior. In this review, we supply a comprehensive perspective on advances in cellulose nanopaper mechanics over the most recent two decades from the three aspects of mechanical properties, structure-property relationship and microstructure-based mechanical modeling. We discuss the effects of size, orientation, polymerization degree, and isolate origins of CNFs; density or porosity and humidity of nanopaper; and hemicellulose and lignin on the mechanical properties of cellulose nanopaper. We also discuss the similarities and differences in the microstructure, mechanical properties, and toughening mechanisms between cellulose nanopaper and cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) nanopaper, chitin nanopaper, carbon nanotube (CNT) nanopaper, and graphene nanopaper. Finally, we present the ideas, status quo, and future trends in mechanical modeling of cellulose nanopaper, including atomistic- and microscale-level numerical modeling, and theoretical modeling. This review serves as a modest spur intended to induce scientists to present their valuable contributions and especially to design more advanced cellulose nanopapers and promote the development of their mechanics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据