4.7 Article

Plate-type acoustic metamaterials: Evaluation of a large-scale design adopting modularity for customizable acoustical performance

期刊

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 156-170

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.01.027

关键词

Large-scale; Plate-type acoustic metamaterial; Resonator; Sound transmission loss; Insertion loss; Modular

资金

  1. Singapore Economic Development Board (EDB) under the EDB Industrial Postgraduate Program (EDB-IPP) [COY-15-IPP/120005]
  2. ST Engineering Land Systems Ltd. under the EDB Industrial Postgraduate Program (EDB-IPP) [COY-15-IPP/120005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the goal of industrial applications, the scalability of finalized designs is important. If typical membrane-type acoustic metamaterials were extended to a larger scale, manufacturing issues-stress uniformity of the membrane and spatial consistency of the platelet, for example-could arise. These issues could be addressed by plate-type acoustic metamaterials with an internal tonraum resonator, which were previously shown to be potential for noise control below 1 kHz. This study presents a large-scale design (or meta-panel) adopting modularity for customizable acoustical performance. By considering two specimen configurations-without and with resonator-the results showed that the acoustical performance of each specimen configuration could be scaled and modularly combined. The acoustical performance of the meta-panel was insensitive to the specimens' orientation and arrangement. Additionally, the meta-panel could still provide up to an average insertion loss of 12.3 dB with 4% of unoccupied slots, not to mention the broadband insertion loss at 125-400 Hz and 0.8-5 kHz, beneficial for many noise environments. Consequently, the proposed design not only could address the potential manufacturing issues of large-scale membrane-type acoustic metamaterials but also could provide customizable acoustical performance, demonstrating scalability and modularity. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据